Identity Theft – Not African American

Share the joy
  • 5

From the very moment in 1492, when Europeans INVADED this Western Hemisphere, there have been a propaganda campaign to cover up that the Americas, was occupied; by “copper color” people which was consider and described, as Negroid, Ethiopian, Oriental by the early explorers; plus the fact, there were biological descendants of Holy Tribes of Israel, living among them.

Since the purpose of the INVASION, was to steal knowledge, land and resources in this hemisphere from the inhabitants, known to Europeans as; Saracens (Negros, Africans, Moors, Hebrews, Egyptians, Ethiopians, etc., and pagans tribes (Olmec, Aztec, Mayans, Inca, etc.); and force these inhabitants into “perpetual slavery”; under the guise of “Papal Edicts” (Dum Diversas, Inter Caetera, Precelse denotionis), of men of, false pagan (Christianity) religion of idol worshiping (cross, rosary, images and icons..Leviticus 26:1, Exodus 20:4, Deuteronomy 5:9)(which is false implementation of the teaching of Yahshua/Jesus, of  a false pagan idol worshiping church (Catholic) (Pope Nicholas V. 1452, Calixtus III. 1456,  Sixtus IV., 1481, Leo X. 1514, Alexander VI. 1493) falsely used the Hebrew Torah/Bible Old Testament as Catholic Church foundation, with distortions; and falsely claiming to represent the Hebrew/Bible Old Testament God’s son, when God’s own “chosen people and representatives”, according to Holy Torah/Bible, are still on this earth.

Supported and financed by Ashkenazi/Khazaria merchants (media, consumables, shipping & insurance), bankers, aristocrats, and private membership lawyers guild (BAR/IBAR = Domestic/International Law); which are “Gentile” converts to Semitic Afro Asiatic Hebrew People Laws & Statues (Old Testament:Laws of Moses), speaking an Afro Asiatic language, now with a German dialect (Yiddish).

Gentiles took the opportunity to moved upon remnants of Hebrews Israelites left in Israel during Israel’s Assyrian captivity/exile circa 700BCE, and later Babylonian captivity/exile circa 600BCE; and in great numbers Khazaria People joined themcirca 700’sCEfalsely claiming to be descendants of the Semitic Afro Asiatic Hebrew people of northeast/Middle East Africa.

If one tells and live a falsehood long enough, it becomes what appears to be the alleged truth.  Generations down the line, will only know what they were taught or told; but the Holy Scriptures of the Prophets & Scribes, and Afro Asiatic forensic paternal & mitochondria DNAproves otherwise.

Since the late 700’sCE, Europe was dominated by the Saracen merchants (media, consumables shipping & insurance), bankers, aristocrats, and the Muslims that held power in Europe until 1492CE; however, Muslim/Islam moved into parts of Africa and Western Asia, as the Ottoman Empire until circa 1922CE.

Europeans has adopted racism & ethnic cleansing (also, now incarceration & social programming), as a way to manipulate, control and discriminate against anyone, that could have been of the Muslim faith, or had the Saracen “copper color” physical appearance.

Based on physical “copper color” appearance,  Europeans could not tell who was whom(pagans, Muslims or Africans, Semitic Hebrews, etc.)so Europeans solutionis to hold all “copper color people” in perpetual slavery; so Europeans can steal physical & intellectual property; and create wealth for themselves from “perpetual slave/debt/labor”; and keep the “copper color” Saracen inhabitants of earth, from ever being over Europeans again(including God’s “chosen representatives”), who are re gathering to restoring order, upon the earth, as the Holy Scriptures have prophesied.


We/I, the descendants pre-America “copper color” (Aboriginal, Indigenous, Native Tribes, Negro, Black, Moors, Hebrew, Ethiopian, Pacific-Atlantic-Caribbean Islanders, African American, Afro Descendant, etc.) people of the Americas have spent over 500 years victims of ethnic cleansing, genocide, miscegenation, slavery, to hide and distort our nations, tribes and people; under our oppressors; and the 150 years under an “de facto” criminal 1871 private municipal corporation (see District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871), which has been pretending to be the dormant/vacant “de jure” 1776 United States of Americaoperating outside its legislative restricted “ten square mile” boundary of within the District of Columbia; and treating “copper color” non-Citizen Nationals Afro Descendants as “perpetual chattel slaves/citizen/debt laborers” from “cradle to grave”, for generations.10eb3fd44159c988354c32e60c5d591b

The United States is a District of Columbia corporation. In Volume 20: Corpus Juris Sec. § 1785 we find “The United States government is a foreign corporation with respect to a State” (see: NY re: Merriam 36 N.E. 505 1441 S. 0.1973, 14 L. Ed. 287). Since a corporation is a fictitious “person” (it cannot speak, see, touch, smell, etc.), it cannot, by itself, function in the real world. It needs a conduit, a transmitting utility (Strawman=Nom de guerre)a liaison of some sort, to “connect” the fictional person, & fictional world in which it exists, to the real world. (US Supreme Court)

This Corporation has use its The Buck Act Title 4 United States Code § 110 (d) and (e) created an illegal and covert secret federal State conclave (THE STATE OF*******) within the boundaries of any sovereign state.

(d) The term “State” includes any Territory or possession of the municipal federal corporate United States.
(e) The term “Federal area” means any lands or premises held or acquired by or for the use of the United States or any department, establishment, or agency, of the United States; and any Federal area, or any part thereof, which is located within the exterior boundaries of any State, shall be deemed to be a Federal area located within such State.

Living among the (Aboriginal, Indigenous, Native Tribes, Negro, Black, Moors, Hebrew, Ethiopian, Pacific-Atlantic-Caribbean Islanders, African American, Afro Descendant, etc.)are real DNA biological “Copper Color” Afro Asiatic Children and Nation of Israel; whose identity has been stolen and hidden over millenniums, by gentile Europeans claiming to be of the Tribe of Judah.native_Black_1

Revelation 2:9
I know your afflictions and your poverty–yet you are rich! I know about the slander of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.

The Buck Act Title 4 United States Code § 110 (d) and (e) means there are two states illegally, secret and covertly sharing the same boundaries.

The “de jure” North Carolina State Republic = Sovereign Republic of these united States of America, established in 1783 Treaty of Peace, as one original thirteen original (13) Colonies; which lies dormant/abandon of its “legal” constitutional officers, where government officers and representatives of local and state levels, committed a “coup et tat”, on February 21, 1781, and join the private foreign owned corporate municipal government “aka” (United States, Inc.); as the municipal sub-corporation of the United States, Inc., as the “de facto” State of North Carolina; since the “Civil War” bankrupted the “de jure” North Carolina State Republicwith no currency to pay debts or wages (gold or silver), property or assets for collateral for international bankers.

CITIZENSHIP/Non CITIZENSHIP of the North Carolina State Republic are “de jure” State Citizens and “de jure” non-Citizen Nationals of the united States of America (Afro-Descendants/Negros,  Article 4, Article of Confederation Inhabitants) and defined in Title 8 United States Code 1101(a)(21),  NON-CITIZEN NATIONAL of these United States of America …

The term “national” of the united States of America/United States is defined in section 101(a)(22) of the INA, and explained in detail in section 308 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).”

“non Citizen nationals”, or “state nationals”, or “non Citizen nationals of the United States*** of America” under Title 8 United States Code §1101(a)(21)… if you were born in and are domiciled in a “de jure” state of the Union… NOT THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

(a)(21) The term “national” means a person owing permanent allegiance to a “de jure” state.”….NOT THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

“While all U.S. citizens are U.S.A./U.S. nationals, NOT EVERY U.S. NATIONAL IS A U.S. CITIZEN.  Very few fall into the category of non-citizen U.S. National as defined in the Immigration and Nationality Act.”

“Non-citizen nationals are allowed to reside and work in the United States without restrictions. They are given U.S.A. passports with a special endorsement stating that the holder is a U.S. national, and not a U.S. citizen.”, IF THE WISH TO LEAVE THE COUNTRY.

These Negros descendant Natives are Articles of Confederation, Article 4 Indigenous inhabitants, and during the Civil War they became freed non-Citizen nationals of these United States of America,  owing allegiance to the “de jure” States Republic they are domicile in (if they wished) … and no allegiance to the “de facto” municipal federal corporation of the United States Inc., or its sub-corporations of The State of ****** which has been pretending (since 1865-end Civil War) it is one of the “de jure” sovereign state republics of these united States of America.

Articles of Confederation, Article 4
1 Mar. 1781
Article IV. The better to secure and perpetuate mutual friendship and intercourse among the people of the different states in this union, the free inhabitants of each of these states, paupers, vagabonds and fugitives from justice excepted, shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several states; and the people of each state shall have free ingress and regress to and from any other state, and shall enjoy therein all the privileges of trade and commerce, subject to the same duties, impositions and restrictions as the inhabitants thereof respectively, provided that such restriction shall not extend so far as to prevent the removal of property imported into any state, to any other state, of which the Owner is an inhabitant; provided also that no imposition, duties or restriction shall be laid by any state, on the property of the united states, or either of them.

United States Nationals (non-citizen) are natives of an North American territorial possession or Indigenous Lands, that the United States has been trying to steal.

Nationals are entitled to all of the legal protection a U.S. citizens would have but do not have the complete political rights of a U.S. citizen.

Non-citizen nationals are allowed to reside and work in the United States without restrictions. They are given U.S.A passports with a special endorsement stating that the holder is a U.S. national and not a U.S. citizen. A non-citizen national may apply for citizenship under the same rules as legal permanent residents.

However, Concerning taxation, non-citizen nationals are exempt from paying a federal income tax or taxes to the federal government on wealth accrued within the territory. Territories, commonwealths, and possessions may, however, implement taxation plans which mirror those of the United States. They also receive economic assistance through some, but not all, national benefit programs or services such as Social Security.

MUCH EFFORT HAS BEEN TO DESTROY AND HIDE THIS CITIZENSHIP FROM EACH STATE REPUBLIC and replace with municipal “debt slave/taxpayer/human resources citizenship”, of the private municipal corporate United States, Inc.

The “de facto” State of North Carolina = sub municipal corporation “federal zone” of the municipal United States, Inc., that covertly and illegally pretends it’s the “de jure” sovereign North Carolina State Republic, operating within the same state boundaries.

In 1818, the Supreme Court stated that:

“The exclusive jurisdiction which the United States have in forts and dock-yards ceded to them, is derived from the express assent of the states by whom the cessions are made. It could be derived in no other manner; because without it, the authority of the state would be supreme and exclusive therein,” 3 Wheat., at 350, 351.  [U.S. v. Bevans, 16 U.S. 336 (1818), reaff. 19 U.S.C.A., section 1401(h).]

The above case establishes that the federal government only has jurisdiction over federal property that it owns within the states or coming under Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 of the U.S. Constitution.

In other places, it has no legislative or judicial jurisdiction.   In other places coming under the sovereignty or exclusive legislative jurisdiction of the federal government under 1:8:17 of the Constitution include the District of Columbia, federal territories, and enclaves within the state and we call these areas “the federal zone”.

When Congress is operating in its exclusive jurisdiction over the “federal zone”, it is important to remember that the U.S. Government has full authority to enact legislation as private acts pertaining to its boundaries, and it is not a state of the union of States because it exists solely by virtue of the compact/constitution that created it.

The U.S. Constitution does not say that the District of Columbia must guarantee a Republican form of Government to its own subject citizens within its territories(See Hepburn & Dundas v. Ellzey, 6 US. 445(1805); Glaeser v. Acacia Mut. Life Ass’n., 55 F. Supp., 925 (1944); Long v. District of Columbia, 820 F.2d 409 (D.C. Cir. 1987); Americana of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Kaplus, 368 F.2d 431 (1966), among others).the-dred-scott-case-1846-1857-402x618


It was confirmed by the “de jure” Constitutional Supreme Court, under Articles III and IV, argued by United States of America Supreme Court Chief Justice, Roger B. Taney (pronounced Tawney), the highest court in the “de jure” these united States of America; that Afro-Descendants/Negros (free or slave descendants of “copper color” = non-Citizen Nationals with unalienable Rights), can not be Citizens of these united States of America (State nor Federal) (DRED SCOTT v. SANDFORD, 60 U.S. 393 (1856) 60 U.S. 393 (How.); the Afro Descendants/Negros are Article 4, “free inhabitants” of the Article of Confederation.

Citation. 60 U.S. 393, 15 L. Ed. 691, 1856 U.S. 19 HOW 393.

Brief Fact Summary. A slave sought his freedom under the Missouri Compromise.

Synopsis of Rule of Law. “Slaves or Free Men of color, and their descendants” are not citizens under the ORIGINAL 1787 United States of America Constitution.

FactsDred Scott (Plaintiff) was a slave living in the slave state of Missouri. His owner took him to Illinois and then to Minnesota, which were both free states under the Missouri Compromise. Plaintiff and his owner returned to Missouri, and Plaintiff was sold to Sanford (Defendant). Plaintiff sued Defendant for his freedom, claiming to be a citizen of Missouri, based on having obtained freedom by domicile for a long period in a free state.

Dred Scott was a slave. Under Articles III and IV, argued United States of America Supreme Court Chief Justice, Roger B. Taney (pronounced Tawney), no one but a citizen of the United States could be a citizen of a state, and that only Congress could confer national citizenship. (The de jure United States of America Congress is now dormant with no Congress or officers for this legitimate government )

According to Taney, African Americans/Negros, be they slave or free, were not citizensAs a slave, moreover, Scott was property and had no right to bring suit in federal courts. “In regard to the issue of Scott’s becoming free when he moved to the free State of Illinois,” Taney wrote, “the laws of the State in which the petitioner was currently resident, namely the slave State of Missouri, should apply.”

Of far more serious consequence, the Court also struck down the Missouri Compromise as unconstitutional, because it deprived property owners (slave owners) of the right to take their property anywhere in the United States, thus “depriving them of life, liberty and property under the 5th Amendment.

Any line, or law, that limited the right of slave owners to utilize their property was unconstitutional. Taney then ruled that the Congress could not extend to any territorial governments powers that it did not possess (in this case, the power to limit slavery).

By declaring the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional, Taney not only destroyed one of the delicate compromises that had kept the union together for nearly four decades but also rejected the principle of popular sovereignty.

Popular sovereignty, which held that territories could decide whether or not to allow slavery for themselves, had been strongly advocated by Stephen Douglas, American politician from Illinois and the designer of the Kansas–Nebraska Act. He was a U.S. Representative, a U.S. Senator, and the Democratic Party nominee for President in the 1860 election, losing to Republican Abraham Lincoln.

Every one may renounce or relinquish a right introduced
for his own benefit. 2 Inst. 183; Wing. Max. p. 483, max.
123; 4 Bl. Comm. 317; The People v. Van Rensselaer, 9 N.Y.
291, 333.

Free Men of Color”Slaves and their descendants did not ask, vote or pledge,  to be debt citizens/chattel slaves/employees of the 1871 private municipal federal corporation; established in an “coup et tat”, by a treasonous 41st Congress, with introduction of the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871; which restricts this municipal federal government, that is masquerading as the country of the United States of Americato ten (10) square miles of the District of Columbia. (not outside boundary of DC or over de jure” States of the Union.) The Free Men of Color”, Slaves and their descendants were made debt citizens/chattel slaves/employees of the 1871 private municipal federal corporation, based on the “color of their skin” and  “counterfeit” 14th, 15th admendments of an “counterfeit” municipal corporate federal Constitution for a criminal racketeering government “restricted” to the District of Columbia; and not for the sovereign State Republics of these united States of America.

According to one of the last real/legal “de jure” laws of these United States of America on Slaves status, before it was overthrown, in 1871;  slaves or free “men of color” and their descendants can not be citizens of state or federal governments.

Double verify all this information for yourself and know its truth.